Reader Analysis

Reader Analysis Worksheet

Primary Readers: The A4 Grant Committee
Motives: To insure grants made meet the purpose for the funding
Values: To meet overall mission statement
Attitudes: Skeptical, critical, in an attempt to insure the most effective and efficient use of funds.
Emotions: Assumed to be positive towards well-written proposals

Secondary Readers School of Education Administrators:
Motives: Gain information from grant proposal
Values: May be negative and opposed to the process, not valuing the review process.
Attitudes: Skeptical of the process and its potential results
Emotions: May be hostile, due to ramifications from study results

Tertiary Readers: School of Education Faculty
Motives: Gain information from grant proposal
Values: May be negative and opposed to the process, not valuing the review process
Attitudes: Skeptical of the process and its potential results
Emotions: Hostile and envious

Gatekeepers: Chair of the A4 Grant Committee
Motives: To insure grant proposals meet eligibility requirements
Values: To meet overall mission statement
Attitudes: Critical, to insure proper format of grant application
Emotions: Unemotional and rational